3 responses to “The Brown Sustainable Food Initiative”

  1. sam

    while i am glad to see sustainable food getting some press, this article takes a tone i find quite offensive. do you have to throw in those wisecracks about those “primitive” advocates of organic agriculture? it perpetuates the myth that good food is only for “kindly hippies fresh off their last hit of marijuana”, a myth i believe to be damaging not only to the reputation of this burgeoning food movement, but to america’s chances of ensuring a safe food supply well into the future. taking this tone of voice turns an otherwise informative and well written article into yet another excuse to write off supporters of local/sustainable food as dirty, inefficient, and addicted to drugs. if you were in touch with the food movement these days you would know that this is not the case. certainly, there is some truth in the labels you use. i am not denying that the public perception of sustainable/organics has traditionally been one of grubby hippies and all that peace/love bullshit. that is why i find this article so problematic. in order to overcome the stigma of its history(something i don’t think should exist yet it remains a fact) we need to bridge the gap between the “dirty hippies” and ivy league types like you. this is about food. not about how one dresses, what one smells like, or yes, even what substance one chooses to abuse. so please, keep writing the articles(i found it highly informative by the way). just don’t assume that everyone sympathetic to “the cause” is a dirty hippy. otherwise, it will take considerably longer for people to see sustainable food as a “legitimate” issue.

    sincerely,
    a clean-cut, fresh-smelling, drug-free food activist

    Reply

  2. Bigbastard

    when you write an article make a point to not come off as a douchebag. makes is much easier to read and not want to kick the writer in the face.

    Reply

  3. amanda

    I hope that the author of this article eats as much genetically modified food as his little uniformed heart desires. This “article” is almost as offensive as it is inaccurate. I am assuming that the author is not an economics major. I am left a little confused by the “rough math” theory posited in the article. First of all, how much per acre is a farmer out west making? Secondly, what is the difference in real estate value? Labor? What is the growing season? Oh, but I suppose the author would like to just ignore these considerations and stick to his “rough math”.
    Then of course there was my personal favorite in which the author spoke about “real world farms” being thousand of acres farmed by a group of farmers. Where is that Jason? I must assume you are talking about those sucessful cotton and sugar platations that liberal hippies opposed a couple hundred years ago…. Are you aware of the average size of farms or the agricultural crisis of the 1980’s??? Why do we need farm subsides anyway?
    I am guessing the author of this article has never been to a farm nor was able to set aside his judgment of organic farmers long enough to ever talk to one. I wish the author of this article a very well planned, economically successful life. Make sure to eat plenty of pesticide and herbicide ridden gm foods and don’t ever let me catch you without your shoes on.

    Reply

Leave a Reply